10 Things to Consider When Exploring Automation for ELISA
Have you reached the conclusion that automation is a no longer a luxury, but a necessity? And yet you find yourself at a crossroad, not knowing which path offers the right solution for your lab?
With limited resources, multiple improvements to implement, other demands that require your attention, and automation solutions that all sound the same, you might be enticed to let your budget lead the way!
Do not give your budget the driver’s seat
Reduce background noise by considering these ten factors during your automation selection journey. Based on applying the rigors of a problem-solving mindset and an analysis of your current ELISA workflow processes these help identify wastes and bottlenecks and compensating step or behavior.The right solution should remove the most critical barriers, enabling you to reach your automation goals with the flexibility to modify and expand. After all, change is the key to progress and growth.
Ten things to consider:
- List the improvements you want to implement. Top reasons for automating ELISA methods:
- Increase Throughput
- Reduce hands-on time
- Reduce need for duplications
- Reduce turnaround time
- Increase Lab’s Efficiency
- Eliminate manual data entry
- Improve scheduling processes
- Strengthen assessment and adoption of new methods
- Talent Retention
- Replace manually intensive tasks
- Expand the expertise of scientists in automation
- Prevent output reduction due to loss of experience
- Improve Quality and Consistency
- Reduce imprecision and increase productivity
- Reduce data inaccuracy
- Enable traceability
- Map out your ELISA workflow(s) and identify the bottlenecks/wastes with your current processes. The main wastes associated with ELISA methods are:
Waiting
- Do you need to standby during incubations because time is too short to start or attend to another task?
- Are you waiting for data entry verification before release to verify accuracy of manual data entry?
Lead time
- Do you perform extra steps to overcome manual pipetting mishaps, such as using a contrast background under well plates to verify the right reagent was added to the right well?
Repetitive motion
- Track your footsteps and identify repetitive motions. Are you going back and forth from the incubator to the washer, processing a handful of plates at a time due to different incubation times or capacity to carry/process a few plates at a time?
Over-Processing
- Are you taking multiple measurements during specific steps? An example is running calibrators and controls in quadruplicates and samples in triplicates to control and/or overcome manual pipetting errors.
- Have you implemented an extensive system of checks and balances to verify accuracy of manual data entry associated with varied data report formats of different analyzers?
Quality Issues
- Have quality outcomes been impacted by steps in your workflow?
- Have you experienced data loss or lack of traceability due to misplacement of notebooks or analyzer’s printout?
Unused creativity
- Would your lab benefit from faster adoption of new methods?
- Have you lost talent due to burn out and/or manual and mind-less work?
- Identify the sources for each waste/bottleneck, current compensating steps/behavior, and their impact on reaching your lab’s main goal.
Example of a lab with compensating steps to improve quality issues while negatively impacting their
goal of increasing throughput:
| Waste | Source | Compensating Behavior | Negative Impact on Increasing Throughput |
| Quality
issues |
Lack of reproducibility: manual pipetting | Over processing: calibrators & controls n=4; samples n=3 | Med |
| Manual data entry verification | Data entry each day from 4-5 | High | |
| Inconsistent plate handling due to scheduling mishaps | 2 x day scheduling verification;
30 minutes each round
Use of sticky notes as a reminder |
High | |
| Lack of traceability | Electronic notebook | Low |
- Ensure automation can remove the bottlenecks. Below are two examples to consider if automation is the right approach:
- Your desired outcome is to reduce turnaround time. While automation can help improve throughput, depending on your processes and level of automation, it can reduce the turnaround time as its goal is increasing the efficiency of processing all plates.
- Your goal is to improve test accuracy. This factor is driven by the ELISA method/reagent accuracy and the accuracy and detection range of the reader. It might be time to upgrade your reader!
- Define your required throughput (# of plates/tube per day). The volume of labware you are processing impacts the liquid handling deck size, additional equipment needed such as plate and tip storage, and level of integration.
- Identify sample source for each method (plates, tubes, tube size) to select the right accessories.
- Assess the experience and readiness of your team to determine the support level needed.
Automation Experience |
Comfort with learning new equipment and SW |
Support Needs |
||||
| Low | Med | High | Private class room training | On-site training | Application support | |
| Novice |
x | x | x | |||
| x | x | x | x | |||
| Highly experienced | x | x | ||||
- Select a super user. This ensures faster adoption of the automation regardless of your lab’s readiness.
- Do not forget about scheduling to help you maximize the usage of your automation and data management; automation can cause a data avalanche!
- Remember, you can start with automating a few steps that have the highest impact. Select solutions that are expandable as your team gains experience and find new ways for further improvement.
Don’t have time for this analysis?
Contact us as Beckman.com to consult with automation experts who have years of experience automating a wide range of ELISA methods. Our approach is consultative, providing solutions for a wide range of automation, from a simple solution of timely plate reading via our “Automation Assistant” software to a full, walk-away automation solutions, enabling consistent and timely plate processing of multiple ELISA methods with data acquisition and reporting capabilities.
Biomek automated workstations are not intended or validated for use in the diagnosis of disease or
other conditions.
Helpful Links
-
資料集
-
アプリケーションノート
- 17-Marker, 18-Color Human Blood Phenotyping Made Easy with Flow Cytometry
- 21 CFR Part 11 Data Integrity for On-line WFI Instruments
- 8011+ Reporting Standards Feature and Synopsis
- Achieving Compliant Batch Release – Sterile Parenteral Quality Control
- 気中浮遊粒子のモニタリング:ISO21501-4校正のインパクト
- An Analytical Revolution: Introducing the Next Generation Optima AUC
- Analyzing Mussel/Mollusk Propagation using the Multisizer 4e Coulter Counter
- Automated 3D Cell Culture and Screening by Imaging and Flow Cytometry
- Automated Cell Plating and Growth Assays
- Automated Cell Transfection and Reporter Gene Assay
- Automated Cord Blood Cell Viability and Concentration Measurements Using the Vi‑CELL XR
- Automated Genomic Sample Prep-Ampure XP PCR
- Automated Genomic Sample Prep-RNAdvance
- Automated Genomic Sample Prep-Sample Quality Control
- Automated salt-assisted liquid-liquid extraction
- Automated Sample Preparation for the Monitoring of Pharmaceutical and Illicit Drugs by LC-MS/MS
- Automated Transfection Methods
- Automated XTT Assay for Cell Viability Analysis
- Automating a Linear Density Gradient for Purification of a Protein:Ligand Complex
- Automating Biopharma Quality Control to Reduce Costs and Improve Data Integrity
- Automating Bradford Assays
- Automating Cell Line Development
- Automating Cell Line Development
- Automating Cell-Based Processes
- Automating the Cell Line Development Workflow
- The new Avanti J-15 Centrifuge Improves Sample Protection and Maximizes Sample Recovery
- The New Avanti J-15 Centrifuge Time Saving Deceleration Profile Improves Workflow Efficiency
- Avanti JXN Protein Purification Workflow
- Avoid the Pitfalls When Automating Cell Viability Counting for Biopharmaceutical Quality Control
- Beer, Evaluation of Final Product and Filtration Efficiency
- Biomek Automated Genomic Sample Prep Accelerates Research
- Biomek Automated NGS Solutions Accelerate Genomic Research
- 超遠心機および自動分注装置を用いた カーボンナノチューブの調製・精製と 分析用超遠心システムによる解析
- Cell Counting Performance of Vi–Cell BLU Cell Viability Analyzer
- Cell Line Development – Data Handling
- Cell Line Development – Hit Picking
- Cell Line Development – Limiting Dilution
- Cell Line Development – Selection and Enrichment
- Changes to GMP Force Cleanroom Re-Classifications
- Characterizing Insulin as a Biopharmaceutical Using Analytical Ultracentrifugation
- ハンドヘルド型気中パーティクルカウンターで行う クリーンキャビネットの定期的な評価
- Cleanroom Routine Environmental Monitoring – FDA Guidance on 21 CFR Part 11 Data Integrity
- Comparing Data Quality & Optical Resolution of the Next Generation Optima AUC to the Proven ProteomeLab on a Model Protein System
- Conducting the ISO 14644-3 Cleanroom Recovery Test with the MET ONE 3400
- Considerations of Cell Counting Analysis when using Different Types of Cells
- Consistent Cell Maintenance and Plating through Automation
- Control Standards and Method Recommendations for the LS 13 320 XR
- Counting Efficiency: MET ONE Air Particle Counters and Compliance to ISO-21501
- Critical Particle Size Distribution for Cement using Laser Diffraction
- CytoFLEX
- Detecting Moisture in Hydraulic Fluid, Oil and Fuels
- Determination of Size and Concentration of Particles in Oils
- Efficient kit-free nucleic acid isolation uses a combination of precipitation and centrifugation separation methods
- dsDNA Quantification with the Echo 525 Liquid Handler for Miniaturized Reaction Volumes, Reduced Sample Input, and Cost Savings
- Compensation Setup For High Content DURAClone Reagents
- Echo System-Enhanced SMART-Seq v2 for RNA Sequencing
- Efficient Factorial Optimization of Transfection Conditions
- Enhancing Vaccine Development and Production
- Enumeration And Size Distribution Of Yeast Cells In The Brewing Industry
- European Pharmacopoeia EP 2.2.44 and Total Organic Carbon
- Evaluation of Instrument to Instrument Performance of the Vi-CELL BLU Cell Viability Analyzer
- Exosome-Depleted FBS Using Beckman Coulter Centrifugation: The cost-effective, Consistent choice
- Flexible ELISA automation with the Biomek i5 Workstation
- Full Automation of the SISCAPA® Workflow using a Biomek NXP Laboratory Automation Workstation
- Fully-Automated Cellular Analysis by Flow Cytometry
- Get Control in GMP Environments
- g-Max: Added Capabilities to Beckman Coulter's versatile Ultracentrifuge Line
- 遠心機によるナノセルロースの分級
- 超遠心法によりナノ粒子を分級して 正確な粒子径を求める方法
- 超遠心分離法 / 動的光散乱法による 顔料インクの分級と粒子径測定
- HIAC Industrial – Our overview solution for fluid power testing for all applications
- HIAC PODS+ Online Mode & Filter Cart Mode
- HIAC PODS+ versus Parker ACM-20 Performance comparison
- A complete workflow for high-throughput isolation of DNA and RNA from FFPE samples using Formapure XL Total on the KingFisher™ Sample Purification System: an application for robust and scalable cancer research and biomarker discovery
- A Highly Consistent BCA Assay on Biomek i-Series
- A Highly Consistent Bradford Assay on Biomek i-Series
- A Highly Consistent Lowry Method on Biomek i-Series
- Highly Reproducible Automated Proteomics Sample Preparation on Biomek i-Series
- Cell Line Development – Hit Picking
- How to Use Violet Laser Side Scatter Detect Nanoparticle
- How Violet Side Scatter Enables Nanoparticle Detection
- HIAC(ハイアック)システムでHRLDセンサーを使用する際の推奨ターボリューム設定
- 油中パーティクルカウンターのサンプル調製 繰返し精度を維持するための最善の方法
- ICH Q2 – the Challenge of Measuring Total Organic Carbon in Modern Pharmaceutical Water Systems
- ICH Q2 – The Challenge of Measuring Total Organic Carbon in Modern Pharmaceutical Water Systems
- Importance of TOC measurement in WFI in light of European Pharmacopoeia change
- Temperature dependence of hydrodynamic radius of an intrinsically disordered protein measured in the Optima AUC analytical ultracentrifuge.
- Isolation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma using Apostle MiniMax™ High Efficiency cfDNA Isolation kit— comparison of fully automated, semi-automated and manual workflow processing
- Issues with Testing Jet Fuels for Contamination
- Leveraging the Vi-CELL MetaFLEX for Monitoring Cell Metabolic Activity
- Linearity of BSA Using Absorbance & Interference Optics
- 光学式パーティクルカウンターにおける「Long Life Lasers(長寿命レーザー)」の検証
- LS 13 320 XR: Sample Preparation - How to measure success
- Particle Size Analysis Simple, Effective and Precise
- Matching Cell Counts between Vi–CELL XR and Vi–CELL BLU
- MET ONE センサーの過酸化水素ガス(VHP)耐性
- 超遠心分離法による 金属コロイド精製と濃縮
- 密度勾配遠心法による 金ナノロッドの分離精製
- Method for Determining Cell Type Parameter Adjustment to Match Legacy Vi CELL XR
- Minimal Sample to Sample Carry Over with the HIAC 8011+
- ミネラルウォーター製造工程のばらつき最小化
- Modern Trends in Non‐Viable Particle Monitoring during Aseptic Processing
- Multi-Wavelength Analytical Ultracentrifugation of Human Serum Albumin complexed with Porphyrin
- ナノ粒子複合材の粒子径測定 - 密度勾配超遠心法と動的光散乱法を用いて -
- What to do now that ACFTD is discontinued
- Optimizing the HIAC 8011+ Particle Counter for Analyzing Viscous Fluids
- Optimizing the Multisizer 4e Coutler Counter for use with Small Apertures
- Optimizing Workflow Efficiency of Cleanroom Routine Environmental Monitoring
- Particle Counting in Mining Applications
- パーティクルカウンター資料集 高圧ガス配管内の清浄度測定- MET ONE 3400ガス校正オプションで ISO 14644の計測を簡単に -
- 無菌医薬品製造区域の環境モニタリング
- 無菌医薬品製造のためのペーパーレスによる環境モニタリング
- Principles of Continuous Flow Centrifugation
- Protein purification workflow
- Background Subtraction
- Calibrating the QbD1200 TOC Analyzer
- Detection Limit
- Inorganic Carbon Removal
- JP SDBS Validation
- Method Overview
- Overload Recovery
- QbD1200 Preparing Reagent Solution
- USP System Suitability
- Quality Control Electronic Records for 21 CFR part 11 Compliance
- Using the Coulter Principle to Quantify Particles in an Electrolytic Solution for Copper Acid Plating
- RCC A standardized automated approach for exosome isolation and characterization
- RCC Avanti J 15 Series Maximizing Sample Protection and Sample Recovery
- RCC Avanti J 15 Series Time Savings and Workflow Efficiency
- Root Cause Investigations for Pharmaceutical Water Systems
- Scalable Plasmid Purification using CosMCPrep
- Specification Comparison of Vi–CELL XR and Vi–CELL BLU
- Specifying Non-Viable Particle Monitoring for Aseptic Processing
- A Standardized, Automated Approach For Exosome Isolation And Characterization Using Beckman Coulter Instrumentation
- Switching from Oil Testing to Water and back using the HIAC 8011+ and HIAC PODS+
- Advanced analysis of human T cell subsets on the CytoFLEX flow cytometer using a 13 color tube-based DURAClone dry reagent
- Using k-Factor to Compare Rotor Efficiency
- 新規格 USP HIAC System 9703+における 少容量サンプルテストへの適用
- Validation of On-line Total Organic Carbon Analysers for Release Testing Using ICH Q2
- Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination of Vi–CELL BLU Instrument
- Vi CELL BLU FAST Mode Option
- Vi-CELL BLU Regulatory Compliance - 21 CFR Part 11
- A workflow for medium-throughput isolation of cfDNA from plasma samples using Apostle MiniMax™ on the KingFisher™ Technology
- 製品カタログ / データシート
- 総合カタログ
-
フライヤー
- 10 Things to Consider When Exploring Automation for ELISA
- Cell Line Development
- Cell-Based Assays
- Continuous Cell Culture
-
ポスター
- Applications of Ultracentrifugation in Purification and Characterization of Biomolecules
- Automating Genomic DNA Extraction from Whole Blood and Serum with GenFind V3 on the Biomek i7 Hybrid Genomic Workstation
- ABRF 2019: Automated Genomic DNA Extraction from Large Volume Whole Blood
- AACR 2019: Isolation and Separation of DNA and RNA from a Single Tissue or Cell Culture Sample
- AACR 2019: Correlation between Mutations Found in FFPE Tumor Tissue and Paired cfDNA Samples
- AGBT 2019: A Scalable and Automatable Method for the Extraction of cfDNA
- ABRF 2019: Simultaneous DNA and RNA Extraction from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) Tissue
- AMP 2019: Correlation Between Mutations Found in FFPE Tumor Tissue and Paired cfDNA Samples
- Automated library preparation for the MCI Advantage Cancer Panel at Miami Cancer Institute utilizing the Beckman Coulter Biomek i5 Span-8 NGS Workstation
- Automating Cell Line Development for Biologics
- Cellular Challenges: Taking an Aim at Cancer
- Cell-Line Engineering
- Characterizing the Light-Scatter Sensitivity of the CytoFLEX Flow Cytometer
- ASHG 2019: Comparison between Mutation Profiles of Paired Whole Blood and cfDNA Samples
- ASHG 2019: Correlation Between Mutations Found in FFPE Tumor Tissue and Paired cfDNA Samples
- Mastering Cell Counting
- Preparing a CytoFLEX for Nanoscale Flow Cytometry
- A Prototype CytoFLEX for High-Sensitivity, Multiparametric Nanoparticle Analysis
- 製品の取扱説明書
- プロトコル
-
導入事例
- 高速冷却遠心機を用いたアデノウイルスベクターの効率的で再現性の良い調製方法
- セルソーターを用いたバイオ燃料高産生藻のハイスループット遺伝子改変オートメーションシステム
- 「細胞のごみ」を分解するオートファジーの 全容に迫る
- B細胞の生成と成熟、維持の研究を創薬にも活かす
- 動脈硬化の免疫的な機序から心血管疾患の治療と予後を研究 ― マルチカラーフローサイトメーターで研究を加速 ―
- 10カラーフローサイトメトリーを用いた細胞マーカー解析の有用性
- 研究に最適な卓上遠心機を選択するポイント
- 新しいアプローチでの膠原病疾患治療に向けて
- 機能性抗体で免疫応答を制御し、新しい治療戦略と創薬に結びつける ― 研究を加速するフローサイトメーター ―
- 炎症の観点から疾患の発症メカニズムを解明し、治療薬を創出する
- がん遺伝子パネル解析/クリニカルシーケンスにおけるFFPE組織切片からのゲノムDNA抽出の重要性
- 大学における留学生を対象とした英語による遠心機の安全教育セミナーの有用性
- 大学における共通機器室の機器管理とサポート体制について
- 超遠心法を用いたエクソソームの分離精製
- 免疫研究で漁業の未来を変える - 研究の効率を上げるフローサイトメーター -
- 高精度の迅速診断に向けて - Navios EXによる造血器腫瘍細胞の10カラー解析の導入 -
- iPS 細胞のメカニズムと 安全で効率のよい 樹立・維持法を追究
- X線結晶構造解析のための膜タンパク質精製の基礎
- 密度勾配超遠心法による簡便な細胞小器官の分画
- 粒子間の相互作用研究から、細胞と粒子の相互作用研究へ
- 虹彩細胞からの網膜細胞再生へ ~MoFlo Astriosの役割~
- 堆積地質学の研究における粒度分布測定
- iPS 細胞由来の “ 肝臓の芽 ” の移植で重度肝疾患の治療を目指す
- 患者の自己骨髄細胞を用いて肝硬変を治療する
- 大学の共通機器室での機器管理とサポート体制について
- 超遠心法によるウイルス精製の基礎
-
ホワイトペーパー
- Centrifugation is a complete workflow solution for protein purification and protein aggregation quantification
- AUC Insights - Analysis of Protein-Protein-Interactions by Analytical Ultracentrifugation
- AUC Insights - Assessing the quality of adeno-associated virus gene therapy vectors by sedimentation velocity analysis
- AUC Insights - Sample concentration in the Analytical Ultracentrifuge AUC and the relevance of AUC data for the mass of complexes, aggregation content and association constants
- Hydraulic Particle Counter Sample Preparation
- eBook
- インタビュー記事
-
アプリケーションノート
お問い合わせ